• m14-335-10
    Inscribed Plaque(?) (©Archaeological Exploration of Sardis/President and Fellows of Harvard College)

    Inscribed Plaque(?) Fragment: Claudian Honorific Inscription for Female Member of Imperial Family

    Date
    41–54 AD?, Roman
    Sardis or Museum Inv. No.
    IN61.081
    Material
    Marble, Stone
    Object Type
    Inscription
    Inscription Type
    Honorific Inscription
    Inscription language
    Greek
    Inscription Text
    		-    -    -    -    -    -
    		[		       ]Τ̣Η̣Ν
    		[	    θυγατ]έρα    ornament
    Inscription Translation
    “[- - - (?) daugh]ter.”
    Inscription Comment
    Site
    Sardis
    Sector
    B
    Trench
    BE 61
    Locus
    B Marble Court
    B-Grid Coordinates
    E25 / N60 *97.80
    Findspot
    Bath-Gymnasium Complex, Marble Court.
    Description
    Fragment of the lower right portion of a plaque(?) of white marble; the top and left side broken. The inscription follows guidelines; in l. 1 only the lower parts of the letters are preserved.
    Dimensions
    H. 0.18, W. 0.23, Th. 0.07, H. of letters 0.038.
    Comments

    Herrmann’s text and restoration. Summary of his commentary:

    The fragment may have belonged to the ensemble of statues of the imperial family probably erected under Claudius (see no. 333 comm.). Because his daughter Antonia was probably honored by Sardis VII 1, no. 37 (no. 336 comm.), the honoree may have been Octavia, who is also honored in a statue group in Ilion representing members of Claudius’s family (IGSK 3, no. 91: [Ὀκτ]α̣ουίαν τὴν θυ[γατ]έρα τοῦ Σεβαστοῦ, with SEG 42, 1095); on the Arch of Claudius in Rome (CIL VI 921; Dessau, ILS 222; cf. CIL VI 8, 2: [O]ctaviai [Ti.] Claudii Caisaris Augusti p. p. filiai, with the “Claudian V” in Octavia’s name) and in the Julio-Claudian group of statues in Rusellae (V. Saladino, ZPE 39 [1980], pp. 222–23, nos. 15–16 [AE 1980, 451]: [O]cta[viae A]ugust[ti f(iliae)]).

    The supplement [μητ]έρα would lead to the restoration of the name of Claudius’s mother, Antonia Minor, which is considered also for no. 336.

    All this remains highly speculative. If the fragment in fact belonged to a plaque and not to a base, there would be little probability that it belonged to a group of statues. The letters resemble those of the other Claudian inscriptions but are smaller.

    See Also
    Bibliography
    Unpublished. Herrmann, ms.
    Author
    GP