• m14-322-10
    Inscribed Plaque Fragments (©Archaeological Exploration of Sardis/President and Fellows of Harvard College)

Inscribed Plaque Fragments: Dossier Containing Petition to a Proconsul

Date
Probably 221 AD (see ll. 18–20 comm.)., Roman
Sardis or Museum Inv. No.
IN01.001
Material
Marble, Stone
Object Type
Inscription
Inscription Type
Letter or Dossier Containing Letters, Decisions, Petitions, Subscriptiones, Honors
Inscription language
Greek
Inscription Text
		-         -         -         -         -        -       -
		Ο̣[ . . ]Ι̣Κ̣Ι̣Ι̣ Ι̣Ο̣[ . . . . .  . . . . .  . . . . .  . . . . ]
		ΑΣ ἐπικαρπίους, ἅτινα [ . . . . .  . . . .]
		σαντες πρῶτον μὲν ΣΕ[ . . . . .  . . . .]
	4	ἀνθυπ. κὲ ἐτύχομεν ὑπογ[ραφῆς ταύτης]·
		       δύνασθε τὰς ἐκ παλαι̣[οῦ ἔθους]
		       θυσίας ἐπιτελεῖν ΕΥΧ[ . . . . .  . . . ]
		       τοῦ θείου οἴκου, ἐμοῦ Κ[ . . . . .  . . . ]
	8	       μόνον τὰς παρανόμους Ε[ . . . . .  . . . ]
		ἀλλὰ κὲ Μαν(ιλίῳ) Φούσκῳ τῷ κρα(τίστῳ) ἀ[νθυπ(άτῳ) ἐτύχο]-
		μεν ὑπογραφῆς ταύτης vac. [	     ]
		       ὑμεῖν ὑπογραφῇ ΧΡΗΣΘ[. . . . . . . . .]
	12	δεόμεθα οὖν σοῦ, κύριε, Θ̣[ . . . . .  . . .  εὐ]-
		λάβειαν ἡμῶν ἐπιτελούν[των τὰ μυστή]-
		ρια κὲ τὰς εἰθισμένας σπο[νδάς  . . . .]
		       ἔχοντες ὑπογραφὰ[ζ  . . . . .  . ἐ]-
	16	       τύχετε δυνάμεν[οι τὰς ἐκ πα]-
		       λαιοῦ ἔθους θυσία[ς ἐπιτελεῖν].
		Ἐξεσφραγίσθη ἐν Σάρδ[εσι πρὸ  - -  καλαν- / (ε)ἰ]-
		δῶν Δεκεμβρίων Γράτ[ῳ
	20	[ὑ]πάτοις, μηνὸς Αὐδνα̣[ίου  - - ].
			vacat
Inscription Translation
“[- - -] fruit-bearing [- - -]; what, after we [- - -] first on the one hand [- - -] proconsul and we obtained the [following] subscriptio:
(5) ‘You can perform the sacrifices, which are established by a long-standing [custom, with prayers for] the Divine (i.e., Imperial) House, while I [- - -] only the unlawful [- - -].’
(9) On the other hand we also [obtained], under the vir clarissimus, [proconsul] Man(ilius) Fuscus, the following subscriptio:
(11) ‘[- - -] to you to make use of (the) subscriptio.’
(12) We therefore ask you, Lord, [- - -] reverence of us performing [the mysteria] and the accustomed [libations].
(15) ‘Having subscriptiones you obtained [- - -] being able [to perform] the sacrifices that are established by a long-standing custom.’
(18) A copy (of this document) authenticated by seal has been issued in Sardis [on the xth day] of December (or November) under the consulship of Gratus [and - - -, on the xth day] of the month Audnaios.”
Inscription Comment
Site
Sardis
Sector
CW6
Trench
CW6 01.2
Locus
CW6 01.2 Locus 11
B-Grid Coordinates
E1454 - E1454.5 / S145 - S145.75
Description
Two joining fragments of a marble plaque; broken on all sides except for the left edge with molding; l. 20 was the last line of the text. Squared lunate sigma, with four bars only in l. 18 (ΓΙΣΘΗ).
Dimensions
H. ca. 0.505, max. W. 0.39, Th. 0.02, average H. of letters 0.015.
Comments

The fragment belongs to a petition that was directed to a proconsul. It was probably sent by members of a religious group who were interested in the performance of long-established sacred festivities. Ll. 15–17 contain the proconsul’s subscriptio. The petitioners quote, as, e.g., in no. 321, earlier official documents concerning their request (here subscriptiones, ll. 6–8 and 11). All the subscriptiones are given with indentation on the left and probably also on the right sides.

A short summary of the ed. pr.:

1–2 Perhaps [θεοὺς καὶ(?) θε]/ὰς ἐπικαρπίους? Cf. the wish for ἀγαθοὶ καρποί, no. 321, 15–16.

A. Chaniotis, EBGR 2009, no. 127 prefers [θυσί]/ας ἐπικαρπίους: “thanksgiving sacrifices after the harvest.”

2 -ΙΟΥΣ·ΑΤΙΝΑ: the stone.

3–4 Comparing ll. 9–10, one might envisage Σε[ . . . . . (cognomen of a proconsul) τῷ κρα(τίστῳ)] / ἀνθυπ(άτῳ) κὲ ἐτύχομεν ὑπογ[ραφῆς ταύτης].

4 Ligature KE (cf. also in ll. 9 and 14, perhaps also in l. 7).

5–6 cf. ll. 16–17. No. 321, 22–23 speaks of τὰς θυσίας…τὰς νενομισμένας ἐκτελεῖσθαι.

6–7 Perhaps something like εὐχ[όμενοι ὑπὲρ] / τοῦ θείου οἴκου (which seems to exceed slightly the line’s length); for the inclusion of the Emperor into the prayers during offerings, cf. no. 321, 14–15.

7–8 The pronoun ἐμοῦ refers to the author of the subscriptio, the proconsul. Maybe it was followed by a genitivus absolutus (ἐμοῦ κ[ωλύοντος]?). Was there, in l. 8, mention of “the illegal decisions,” τὰς παρανόμους ἐ[πικρίσεις]? Cf. the opposite (ἐπικρίσεις ἔννομοι) in no. 321, 8–9; toward the end of the latter inscription (ll. 24–25) ἀνθυπάτων κὲ ἐπιτρόπων ἐπικρίσεις are quoted.

9 ΜΑΝ´ ΦΟΥΣΚΩ: Probably Manilius Fuscus, see L. Petersen, PIR2 M137 and B. Thomasson, Laterculi praesidum I, p. 233, no. 176. He seems to have been proconsul Asiae some time around 210 AD. His wife was probably Flavia Politta whose munificence is known from no. 419, 15; see also P. Herrmann, TAM V 2, 1213.

The dative corresponds to the Latin ablativus temporis; cf. no. 674, 1–2; Sardis VII 1, nos. 52, col. 1, 11–12; and 153, 1–2. It is to be understood that the subscriptio was not only issued “under” Manilius Fuscus but also “by” him. For κράτιστος = vir clarissimus, attributed to men of senatorial rank, see IGSK 24, 1 (Smyrna), no. 600, 12–13 comm. - κρα(τίστῳ) ἀ[νθυπ(άτῳ)]: ΚΡΑΛ̣[ ] the stone.

9–10 See ll. 3–4 comm.

11 χρῆσθ[ε] or χρῆσθ[αι]. Perhaps something like ὑμεῖν ὑπογραφῇ χρῆσθ[αι συγχωρῶ]?

12 ΔΕΟΜΕΘΑ: M corrected from N. The last visible letter of the line could also be an O.

13–14 [τὰ μυστή]ρια: cf. no. 321, 28.

14 cf. no. 321, 13.

16–17 cf. ll. 5–6.

18–20 The text of the inscription until l. 17 is a copy of the petition plus the proconsul’s subscriptio. The copy was probably authenticated by the seals of several witnesses while the original was kept in the archives of Sardis.

According to the calendar of Asia the month Audnaios corresponds to November 23 through December 23. Thus, the precise date may have been a day from November 23 through 30 or December 6 through 12: [πρὸ θ´(η´, ζ´, etc.) καλαν]/δῶν Δεκεμβρίων or [πρὸ ὀκτὼ (ἑπτά, ἕξ, etc.) (ε)ἰ]/δῶν Δεκεμβρίων.

Γράτ[ῳ - - / ὑ]πάτο̣ις: probably the consules ordinarii of 221 AD, C. Vettius Gratus Sabinianus and M. Flavius Vitellius Seleucus, Γράτ[ῳ κὲ Σελεύκῳ | ὑ]πάτοις. Less probable the consuls of 242 AD, C. Vettius Gratus Atticus Sabinianus and C. Asinius Lepidus Praetextatus.

See Also
Bibliography
G. Petzl, “Bedrohter Kultvollzug: Hilfe von höherer Stelle,” in Estudios de Epigrafía Griega, ed. Á. Martínez Fernández (2009), pp. 377–86, photo I (AE 2009, 1391; SEG 59, 1396).
Author
GP