• r2-43-10
    Relief fragment of frog and support, top view. (Telif hakkı Sart Amerikan Hafriyat Heyeti / Harvard Üniversitesi)

    Kurbağa ve Destek Kabartma Parçası

    Dönem
    Lidya?
    Sardeis veya Müze Env. No.
    NoEx71.003
    Malzeme
    Mermer, Taş
    Eserin Türü
    Heykel
    Heykelin Türü
    Hayvan
    Yerleşim
    Sardis?
    Bulunduğu Yeri
    Brought on July 5, 1971, by Muammer Aksoy.
    Tanım
    The soft and simple treatment of the frog’s body is very effective. This simplicity (from above the frog looks like an archaic lion) and the very straight line down the spine suggest an archaic monument. The channel might indicate that the piece was an attachment for a fountain, as in the bronze frog-lion group from Samos. C.H. Greenewalt, Jr. suggests, however, a statuary group from an allegorical representation of Batrachomyomachy; see the stele of Archelaos of Priene, portraying Homer, where two mice represent the Batrachomyomachy (D. Pinkwart, Archelaos, 57, 59, pl. 29 and idem., Musen des Philiskos, 15, pl. 1).
    Condition

    Grayish coarse-grained “local” marble.

    Body and legs on r. side of frog or toad. Tip of head, l. legs, rear tip of body missing. The piece was placed on a half-base, with a channel-like hollow. This hollow was to house a metal piece for support and attachment.

    Boyutlar
    P.L. 0.13; max. W. 0.09; max. H. 0.057-0.06.
    Yorum
    On frogs, cf. Samos bronze frog: Buschor, Altsamische Grabstelen, 15, figs. 212-216; Richter, Animals, 87, fig. 232, coin of Seriphos (?), 500 B.C. R. Nicholls, Recent Acquisitions, fig. 10; Keller, 298; M. Wellman, RE, 1327.
    Ayrıca bakınız
    Kaynakça
    Yazar
    GMAH